Venezuela’s Alliance with Hezbollah and U.S. Escalation Risks Ignite a New Latin American Flashpoint

South American Violence
Written By Matt Helmkamp

Executive Summary

A Senate warning over Hezbollah’s expansion in Venezuela, paired with escalating U.S. covert and military activity in the Caribbean and a diplomatic breakdown with Colombia, signals the reemergence of Latin America as a critical theater in global counterterrorism and great-power competition. The Maduro regime’s alleged partnership with Hezbollah and Iran has transformed Venezuela into both a financing hub for international terrorism and a potential trigger point for confrontation between Washington and its regional adversaries.

Key Judgments

Key Judgment 1

Hezbollah has entrenched itself in Venezuela with state protection, integrating into narcotics, gold, and money-laundering networks vital to its global financing.

Evidence: U.S. Senate testimony by former Treasury officials Marshall Billingslea and Matthew Levitt detailed Venezuelan support for Hezbollah through passport issuance, front companies, and a reported training base on Margarita Island. Up to one-third of Hezbollah’s global funding—around $200 million annually—may now originate from Latin America (Mercopress, Fox News).

Key Judgment 2

The Trump administration’s counter-narcotics campaign has evolved into a militarized, covert operation with regime-change overtones.

Evidence: President Trump publicly confirmed CIA covert operations in Venezuela alongside repeated lethal maritime strikes, B-52 bomber deployments, and special-operations exercises in the Caribbean. The administration’s framing of cartel networks as “narco-terrorists” effectively places them within wartime targeting authorities (Semper Incolumem, CounterPunch).

Key Judgment 3

U.S.-Colombia relations have entered their most severe rupture in decades, jeopardizing hemispheric counter-drug and intelligence cooperation.

Evidence: Following a disputed U.S. strike that killed a Colombian fisherman, President Gustavo Petro accused Washington of “murder” and recalled his ambassador. Trump responded by calling Petro an “illegal drug leader,” cutting aid, and threatening tariffs. Analysts warn the breakdown could paralyze joint counter-narcotics operations and intelligence-sharing (CBS News, The Guardian, CNN).

Key Judgment 4

Colombia’s diplomatic rift may open operational space for Venezuela and Iran-backed networks to expand influence and logistics through the region.

Evidence: Colombia’s suspension of joint patrols and intelligence exchanges undercuts interdiction capacity along trafficking routes that Hezbollah and Venezuelan proxies exploit. Petro’s alignment with non-aligned and socialist blocs weakens U.S. hemispheric leverage at a moment when Tehran and Caracas are tightening economic and military ties (The Guardian, Semper Incolumem).

Analysis

The October 2025 U.S. Senate hearing on Hezbollah’s expansion in Venezuela confirmed long-standing intelligence concerns: that Nicolás Maduro’s regime has become a logistical and financial hub for Iran’s global network. The testimonies of former Treasury and intelligence officials revealed an ecosystem in which Hezbollah operatives launder drug profits, acquire Venezuelan passports, and enjoy state-sanctioned protection. This transformation, years in the making, now positions Venezuela as the Western Hemisphere’s principal convergence point for terrorism, organized crime, and sanctions evasion.

Billingslea’s description of a Hezbollah training site on Margarita Island and evidence of mass passport issuance to Hezbollah and Hamas affiliates underscore the regime’s direct complicity. As sanctions continue to squeeze Iran and its proxies, Latin America offers an alternative revenue and mobility network beyond the reach of U.S. and European monitoring. The so-called “axis of evasion,” linking Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, and now Venezuela, functions as a sanctions-resistant ecosystem built on narcotics, gold smuggling, and oil-for-cash transactions.

In response, the Trump administration has adopted a hybrid counter-narcotics and counter-terrorism campaign that increasingly blurs the line between law enforcement and war. The president’s public confirmation of CIA covert operations inside Venezuela—a rare admission of active paramilitary authority—represents an escalation without congressional sanction. Maritime strikes on suspected “narco-terror” vessels, justified under an expansive self-defense doctrine, have killed at least 30 people in international waters since September. Simultaneously, U.S. B-52 bombers, F-35s, and naval assets have established a persistent deterrence posture in the Caribbean.

The campaign’s stated aim—disrupting drug flows and Hezbollah-linked financing—masks a secondary political objective: coercive pressure on Maduro’s regime. Trump’s rhetoric about “freeing Venezuela” and restoring democratic governance aligns more with regime-change precedent than narrow interdiction. Yet such a strategy carries substantial risk. Venezuelan and Cuban intelligence services have expanded coastal surveillance, mobilized air-defense units equipped with Russian systems, and coordinated propaganda emphasizing “U.S. aggression.” The involvement of Hezbollah-linked operatives or Iranian advisors in Venezuela heightens the danger of asymmetric retaliation, including cyber or proxy attacks.

The crisis now intersects with a second fault line: Washington’s deteriorating relationship with Colombia. Petro’s leftist government, which has pursued peace talks with guerrilla groups and distanced itself from U.S. drug policy, reacted sharply to a U.S. strike that killed a fisherman in Colombian waters. Trump’s personal attack on Petro and abrupt termination of aid represent a diplomatic rupture unseen since the Cold War. Colombia’s recall of its ambassador and suspension of bilateral cooperation undermine decades of security coordination—precisely as Hezbollah and Venezuelan proxies exploit ungoverned border zones.

This widening fissure fractures the regional containment strategy the United States once relied upon. Colombia’s withdrawal from joint maritime surveillance weakens interdiction across the Caribbean basin, granting traffickers and terrorist facilitators greater freedom of movement. Should U.S. operations continue without consent, the legal and diplomatic costs will mount, especially among left-leaning governments sympathetic to Petro’s stance.

Regionally, this alignment could crystallize into a polarized hemisphere: Venezuela, Nicaragua, and Cuba, backed by Iran and Russia, versus U.S.-aligned Caribbean states and potentially Brazil. The risk of escalation lies not in formal war but in accumulated missteps—a strike misattributed, a downed aircraft, or a Hezbollah-linked attack blamed on Caracas. The fusion of counterterrorism and regime-change logic ensures that any such incident could rapidly justify further U.S. intervention.

The convergence of Hezbollah financing, Venezuelan state complicity, and deteriorating U.S.-Colombian relations represents a multi-domain threat: terror finance, narco-trafficking, proxy warfare, and great-power signaling intertwined. The region once viewed as Washington’s strategic rear is now reemerging as a contested battlespace where non-state actors and revisionist states exploit political fragmentation and U.S. overreach alike.

Sources

Matt Helmkamp
Previous

The OSINT Revolution: Open-Source Intelligence Becomes Central to U.S. Intelligence Reform
Next

JNIM Expands Control in Mali: Al-Qaeda’s Road Rulebook and the Collapse of State Authority