Extremist Guide Promotes Framework for Domestic Insurgency and Attempts to Translate Foreign Guerrilla Models to the US Context
Executive Summary
A lengthy document circulating online presents a detailed proposal for building a left-wing insurgency inside the United States. The text blends revolutionary rhetoric with explicit guidance on recruiting fighters, forming guerrilla cells, undermining state institutions, and organizing parallel political and social structures. It draws heavily on foreign insurgent movements, including groups in the Middle East, Latin America, and Africa, while arguing that political polarization, economic instability, and perceived state failures make the US vulnerable to domestic armed struggle. The article represents a convergence of extremist ideology, operational guidance, and historical romanticization designed to attract radicalized individuals seeking a blueprint for violence.
Analysis
The document attempts to frame a US-based insurgency as both historically justified and strategically feasible, drawing from anti-colonial struggles and contemporary militant groups. Its approach mirrors patterns seen in previous extremist manifestos, where political grievances serve as a gateway to operational instruction. By listing required organizational structures, training methods, recruitment strategies, and logistical preparations, it crosses from ideological advocacy into prescriptive extremist guidance.
The author states that the objective is to “destroy the state structure and capitalism,” outlining a future system based on armed militias, collective governance, and expropriation of resources, echoing classic far-left revolutionary frameworks.
The text promotes explicit preparation for armed action, including small clandestine cells, weapons procurement, infiltration of institutions, and secure communications networks, drawing on examples from the Black Liberation Army, EZLN, Hezbollah, PKK, and anti-colonial movements.
The author encourages exploiting crises such as economic deterioration, political division, and international conflict, claiming these conditions weaken state capacity and create openings for violent struggle.
Multiple sections discuss kidnapping, extortion, sabotage, and armed ambushes as legitimate tactics, treating these as necessary stages of growth for a developing insurgency.
The document attempts to fuse anti-racist, anti-capitalist, and anti-colonial rhetoric with operational militant doctrine in a way designed to appeal to disaffected activists who feel traditional political engagement is ineffective. Many references to contemporary conflicts — including Gaza, Syria, and the Sahel — serve as emotional touchpoints intended to legitimize escalation to violence. The text’s admiration for insurgent groups involved in terrorism illustrates the ideological bridging that can move individuals from activism into support for armed action. While the article is not a mass-audience propaganda piece, its granular focus on clandestine structure, logistics, and strategy suggests it is aimed at highly committed individuals already sympathetic to revolutionary violence.
